The resilience portfolio model: Understanding healthy adaptation in victims of violence. Witnessing partner violence: Exploring the role of partner preferences on dating violence. The characteristics of romantic relationships associated with teen dating violence. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 45-50. An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence program. West (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of family communication (pp. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 6, 339-358. Validación del Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) versión espanÌola. Evaluación de la violencia en las relaciones de pareja de los adolescentes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 1132-1152. Age-related changes in dating aggression in Spanish high school students. Theory and teen dating violence victimization: Considering adolescent development. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 14, 39-47. Unperceived dating violence among Mexican students. L., Bringas, C., Rodríguez-Franco, L., Flores, M., Ramiro-Sánchez, T., & Rodríguez, F. The handbook of conflict resolution: theory and practice. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1029-1044. Cross-cultural consistency of the demandwithdraw interaction pattern in couples. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 863-882. Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies: Considerations about test selection in psychological research. Adult attachment styles, destructive conflict resolution, and the experience of intimate partner violence. Bonache, H., Gonzalez-Mendez, R., & Krahé, B.Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 173-179.
Healthy relationship education for dating violence prevention among high-risk youth. American Psychological Association (2013).Conclusions: The final tool, which consisted of 13 items with a good internal consistency, may be useful for assessing the effectiveness of interventions to improve conflict resolution skills, as well as for screening and classification purposes. The second study demonstrated the discriminative capacity of both scales. Results: Besides verifying the adequacy of items, the results of the first study showed the same three-factor structure in both versions: a positive approach to conflicts and two non-constructive styles, engagement and withdrawal. The second study, with 1,938 adolescents, tested whether the factorial structure obtained discriminates between levels of dating violence involvement. Method: In the first study, with 592 adolescents, confirmatory factor analyzes were performed with the two subscales (self and partner). Two studies were conducted, one aimed at analyzing psychometric properties of this instrument, and the other at verifying its ability to discriminate between violent and non-violent adolescent dating partners. Background/Objective: Training in conflict resolution strategies is a goal in different intervention contexts, and the Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory is a proven, useful tool for assessing these skills.
0 kommentar(er)
